Full mode applies unless you switch. Switch to Streamline for sellers whose situation doesn't warrant additional scaffolding. The signed artifact is identical in both modes.
Listing Strategy Decision
A structured comparison of public MLS marketing and restricted-marketing approaches, matched against your own priorities.
Step 1 of 4
Your situation
Step 2 of 4
Side-by-side comparison
Public MLS Marketing
Restricted Marketing
Buyer pool
Every active buyer working with any agent in the region. Full MLS syndication to public platforms and portals, plus brokerage sites.
Buyers working with agents at a single brokerage, plus that brokerage's pre-marketing network.A subset of the full buyer pool.
Median time to contract
Eventually moves to MLS anyway
n/a — already on MLS
Price outcome
Open-market price discovery through competitive buyer activity.
Days on market and price visibility
On a standard public listing, days on market and price changes are generally visible, depending on your MLS's display settings. Visible price reductions can also re-engage buyers: aggregator sites flag the change, agents re-surface the listing to clients, and buyers who passed at the original price reconsider. Ask your agent what your MLS lets you limit.
No public DOM during the restricted-marketing phase, no public price-change visibility. Tradeoff: if a price adjustment is needed, no new buyer activity is generated by it — the reduction happens, but the buyers who would have re-engaged on a public reduction never see it.
Showing volume
Typically higher in first 7–14 days; full market response.
Lower volume; limited to one brokerage's buyer network.
Price feedback mechanism
Showing data, agent feedback, comparative activity across multiple brokerages.
Feedback limited to one brokerage's internal network. If no offers materialize, attribution between price/condition/marketing is harder to isolate.
Dual-agency exposure
Fallback path
If pricing or positioning needs adjustment, the data is visible and the listing remains active in the public market.
If the restricted-marketing phase produces no offer, the home enters the MLS with some buyers having already passed and the new-listing urgency window already spent.
Step 3 of 4
Your priorities, ranked
Drag to reorder. The priority you care about most goes at the top. The one you care about least goes at the bottom. There are no wrong answers — this is your ranking, not ours.
Worth knowing before you rank: Some of these priorities are in genuine tension with each other. The more you prioritize one, the less of another you can have. The main tensions:
Maximum price ↔ Privacy / Control. Broader exposure produces more competition and stronger price discovery. Restricting exposure to preserve privacy or control means a narrower buyer pool; published studies differ on what that does to sale price. Avoiding public days on market is a different kind of priority: depending on your MLS, display settings may serve it without limiting exposure, so check that before treating it as a reason to restrict. You can rank both highly — but the analysis will reflect that one of them won when push came to shove.
Speed of sale ↔ Privacy / Control. The same mechanism. A broader buyer pool can mean more early showings and offers; a smaller pool can mean fewer.
Maximum price ↔ Maximum net proceeds. Sometimes a higher gross price with negotiation friction (concessions, repair credits, longer holding period) nets less than a lower gross with clean terms. These can move together, but sometimes they don't.
Avoiding public price changes ↔ Buyer re-engagement. Public price reductions are how a stalled listing re-engages buyers who passed at the original price. Avoiding the visibility means losing the re-engagement tool.
Rank them honestly, knowing that the top of your list and the bottom of your list reflect real tradeoffs — not just a preference order.
Broader exposurePriorities that public MLS marketing structurally serves better. Broader buyer pool, more competition.
Restricted exposurePriorities that restricted marketing generally serves better. Smaller, controlled buyer pool. For avoiding public days on market and public price changes, check your MLS's display settings first. They may serve the priority without limiting exposure.
Either pathDepends on circumstances; neither approach is structurally better.
Outcome qualityAbout the kind of result, not the exposure approach.
Several priorities fall into the same cluster. Ranking multiple priorities from one cluster high means you're expressing the same underlying preference in different ways — worth knowing as you rank.
Tension in your current ranking:This is a real-time observation, not a constraint — you can rank however you want. The note will update as you reorder.
1BroaderMaximum sale price
Getting the highest possible gross price the market will support⋮⋮
2EitherMaximum net proceeds
Highest take-home after commissions, concessions, repair credits, holding costs — sometimes a lower gross price with cleaner terms produces a higher net than a higher gross with negotiation friction⋮⋮
3BroaderSpeed of sale
Closing in the shortest time possible⋮⋮
4RestrictedPrivacy and discretion
Keeping the sale process out of public view⋮⋮
5RestrictedControl over who sees the home
Limiting showings to a curated buyer pool⋮⋮
6RestrictedSecurity considerations
Limiting public knowledge of the sale for personal-safety reasons⋮⋮
7RestrictedAvoiding public price changes
Keeping any repricing decisions out of public view⋮⋮
8OutcomeCertainty of outcome
Predictable buyer pool and process, even if it costs some upside⋮⋮
9RestrictedAvoiding public DOM accumulation
No publicly visible days-on-market clock⋮⋮
What's the specific reason restricted exposure matters in this sale?
You ranked one or more restricted-exposure priorities in your top three (privacy, security, control, avoiding public DOM, or avoiding public price changes). The strongest cases for restricted marketing involve specific circumstances. Please indicate which fits your situation. This is captured in the signed artifact.
No reason selected yet. Select at least one option above to proceed.
Before we summarize your priorities — a moment worth pausing on
Two ways to handle this:
Re-rank with the tradeoff explicitly in mind. If avoiding the visibility issue is genuinely more important than the price/speed advantages, drop those broader-cluster priorities lower in the list. If the price/speed priorities are more important, drop the visibility priority lower. Either is a coherent ranking. The current order reflects priorities that are structurally in tension — a ranking has to make a choice between them.
Keep the ranking as it stands. The summary will restate your ranking as you set it, and the signed record will note both your stated #1 and the unresolved tension. That's also a fine choice — as long as you're choosing it knowingly.
Acknowledged. The reflection below proceeds with your ranking as stated. The unresolved tension is documented in the signed artifact.
Step 4 of 4
Your priorities, as you ranked them
The summary below restates how you ranked your priorities, set against the comparison above. The comparison starts from full public MLS marketing as its baseline. That starting point is not a recommendation; you decide what to do from here.
Complete your priority ranking above to see the reflection.
Restricted-marketing fallback trigger
Restricted marketing is not open-ended. Before proceeding, document the condition
under which the listing moves to standard MLS marketing if it has not produced
an acceptable offer. This gives restricted marketing a defined endpoint, and it
becomes part of the signed record. You may select more
than one — if you do, whichever condition is met first moves the listing to the MLS.
Acknowledgment
If restricted marketing is selected, the documented fallback trigger above is part of this decision record.
Seller signature
Date
Seller signature (if joint)
Date
Listing agent
Date
Broker of record acknowledgment
Date
On iPad: in Print Options, tap the Share icon to save as PDF or email it.
DEMONSTRATION ONLY — NOT A BINDING DECISION RECORD
Seller(s)
—
Date
—
Property
—
Price Band
—
Timing
—
Selected Marketing Strategy
—
—
Seller's Stated Priorities (Ranked)
Documented Reasons for Restricted-Exposure Choice
Restricted-Marketing Fallback Trigger
Tradeoff Acknowledged
Warnings Acknowledged
Field-level display settings
This record documents the seller's marketing-strategy review. It does not replace the listing agreement, MLS disclosure forms, brokerage policy, or legal advice.
Seller Signature / Date
Seller Signature (if joint) / Date
Listing Agent Signature / Date
Broker of Record Acknowledgment / Date
Want your own LSDR?
You just walked through the Listing Strategy Decision Record.
The branding and figures were placeholders. Each agent enrolls individually.
Your LSDR is set up with your name, brokerage, and MLS.